McCoy v. Ryan et al
Jerry Dean McCoy |
Charles Ryan and Arizona Attorney General |
4:2010cv00052 |
January 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pima |
Raner C Collins |
Glenda E Edmonds |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 22 Report and Recommendations.It is further ordered Petitioners petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Doc. 1) is denied without leave to amend, and this action is dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk should enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 11/18/11.(LMF) |
Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Jerry Dean McCoy. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this report and recommendation to the petitioner and the respondents (see attached pdf for further information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Glenda E Edmonds on 08/09/11. (LMF) Modified on 8/9/2011 to add with opinion (LMF). |
Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that it be dismissed. Parties may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Glenda E Edmonds on 7/9/10. (SSU) Modified on 7/9/2010 to correct document type to WO(SSU). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.