Rodriguez v. Duncan

Petitioner: Jose Rodriguez
Respondent: David Duncan
Case Number: 4:2010cv00209
Filed: April 9, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Graham
Referring Judge: Bernardo P Velasco (PS)
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 24, 2011 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 27 . IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Velascos Report and Recommendation (Doc.27) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice and closed. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 5/24/11.(KAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?