Brubaker et al v. Tucson, City of et al
| Richard Brubaker and Barbara Stapleton |
| Tucson, City of, Jack Woolridge, Michael James Pelton and Pima County Board of Supervisors |
| 4:2010cv00649 |
| November 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Bernardo P Velasco |
| Frank R Zapata |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
333
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Judgment on Taxation of Costs (Doc. 329 ). Defendants are awarded $1681.05 in taxable costs. This order modifies the Taxation Judgment (Doc. 327 ) entered on September 21, 2022. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/31/2022. (LFIG)
|
|
Filing
226
ORDERED that the Motion to Extend Time (Doc. 218 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Review of Judgment on Taxation of Costs (Doc. 219 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall amend the Judgment on Taxation of Costs to be: $3,674.35. Review attached Order for details. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 11/2/2020. (MCO)
|
|
Filing
212
ORDERED that the Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 199 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the question of taxable costs is referred to the Clerk of the Court. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 5/7/2020. (REVIEW ATTACHED ORDER FOR DETAILS) (MCO)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDERED that the Motion in Limine Re: Scope of Evidence and Available Damages (Doc. 142 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall review and revise the proposed Jury Instructions to account for the rulings made herein. Revised jury instructions shall be filed by February 24, 2020. (REVIEW ORDER FOR DETAILS.) Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 2/18/2020. (MCO)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDERED that a Pretrial Conference is set for Monday, September 16, 2019 at 10:30 AM before the Honorable David C. Bury in Courtroom 6B, Sixth Floor, Evo A. DeConcini United States Courthouse, 405 W. Congress Street, Tucson, Arizona. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 7/9/2019. (ARC)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER LIFTING STAY and this case is returned to the Court's active docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order by May 22, 2019. See Attached PTO. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/22/2019. (MCO)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: the Report and Recommendation Doc. 103 is ADOPTED as the ruling of this Court. The City Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Doc. 84 is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiffs' claims of violation of Art. 2, Sec. 8 of the Arizona Constitution and the Tucson City Code but denied on all other grounds. The County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Doc. 86 is GRANTED. Objections are OVERRULED. No Final Judgment shall be entered at this juncture. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/16/2018. (MCO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
