Dauenhauer v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Robert Stephen Dauenhauer, II
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2010cv00782
Filed: December 22, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Referring Judge: D Thomas Ferraro
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 23, 2011 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER 18 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is further ordered remanding this case for further administrative proceedings. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 12/22/11. (LMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dauenhauer v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Michael Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Stephen Dauenhauer, II
Represented By: Meghan McNamara Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?