Day v. LSI Corporation

Day v. LSI Corporation

Plaintiff:	Kenneth Day
Defendant:	LSI Corporation
Case Number:	4:2011cv00186
Filed:	March 31, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2016	Filing 219 ORDERED, Defendant's 176 original Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's 184 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant's 179 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Summary judgment is awarded in favor of LSI and against Day. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/28/2016. (See Order for details) (KEP)
December 20, 2012	Filing 138 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiffs 85 , 112 Motions for Default Judgment, Sanctions, and to Strike are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Partial Default Judgment is awarded in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as to Plaintiff's claim re garding the 30,000 shares of LSI stock as stated in Count II of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is awarded monetary sanctions for the spoliation of evidence in the amount of $10,000. Defendant shall pay the monetary sanction within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiffs 61 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Defendants 72 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Plaintiffs 112 request for disclosure and to strike declarations are DISMISSED AS MOOT. Parties shall file briefs addressing the appropriate procedure to follow to determine damages by 1/22/13. Plaintiffs 134 Motion for Hearing is DENIED. Plaintiffs 135 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Parties shall disclo se names of all fact witnesses to be used at trial, by 1/7/13. Plaintiff shall file any response to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on by 1/22/13. Defendant shall file any reply on or before 2/8/13. Plaintiff shall file any final dispositive motion by 1/22/13. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 12/19/12.(BAC)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2016

Filing 219 ORDERED, Defendant's 176 original Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's 184 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant's 179 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Summary judgment is awarded in favor of LSI and against Day. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/28/2016. (See Order for details) (KEP)

December 20, 2012

Filing 138 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiffs 85 , 112 Motions for Default Judgment, Sanctions, and to Strike are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Partial Default Judgment is awarded in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as to Plaintiff's claim re garding the 30,000 shares of LSI stock as stated in Count II of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is awarded monetary sanctions for the spoliation of evidence in the amount of $10,000. Defendant shall pay the monetary sanction within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiffs 61 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Defendants 72 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Plaintiffs 112 request for disclosure and to strike declarations are DISMISSED AS MOOT. Parties shall file briefs addressing the appropriate procedure to follow to determine damages by 1/22/13. Plaintiffs 134 Motion for Hearing is DENIED. Plaintiffs 135 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Parties shall disclo se names of all fact witnesses to be used at trial, by 1/7/13. Plaintiff shall file any response to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on by 1/22/13. Defendant shall file any reply on or before 2/8/13. Plaintiff shall file any final dispositive motion by 1/22/13. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 12/19/12.(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Day v. LSI Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Day
Represented By:	James Michael Morris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: LSI Corporation
Represented By:	Robert W Cameron
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?