Butcher v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Mark David Butcher
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2011cv00619
Filed: September 28, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Jacqueline J Marshall
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 28, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court IT IS ORDERED: United States Magistrate Judge Rateau's Report and Recommendation Doc. 8 is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 5/28/13.(KAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Butcher v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark David Butcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?