United States of America v. Chevrolet Tahoe 1999, VIN #1GNEK13R7XJ487970

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Chevrolet Tahoe 1999, VIN #1GNEK13R7XJ487970
Case Number: 4:2011cv00640
Filed: October 6, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Charles R Pyle
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 08:1324
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 9, 2012 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 10 Motion for Default Judgment. Defendant 1999 Chevrolet Tahoe, VIN 1GNEK13R7XJ487970, is forfeited to the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles R Pyle on 1/6/12.(SMBE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Chevrolet Tahoe 1999, VIN #1GNEK13R7XJ487970
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Reese Valiant Bostwick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chevrolet Tahoe 1999, VIN #1GNEK13R7XJ487970
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?