Rattler v. Arizona Department of Corrections

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Rattler v. Arizona Department of Corrections

Rattler v. Arizona Department of Corrections

Plaintiff:	Leo Rattler
Defendant:	Arizona Department of Corrections
Case Number:	4:2011cv00777
Filed:	December 2, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 20, 2013	Filing 26 ORDER: Defendant's Motion 25 to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff's Objection to the Self Appointment of the Attorney Gene ral's Office to Defend Defendant Rabie in this Cause (sic), which is construed as a Motion to Disqualify the Arizona Attorney General's Office from representing Defendant Rabie is DENIED (Doc. 20). Defendant Rabie's 18 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed in its entirety as it is barred by the statute of limitations. Defendant Rabie's Request for Attorney's Fees is DENIED. Each Party shall bear their own costs and fees. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 8/20/2013. (See attached PDF for complete information)(ALS)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 20, 2013

Filing 26 ORDER: Defendant's Motion 25 to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff's Objection to the Self Appointment of the Attorney Gene ral's Office to Defend Defendant Rabie in this Cause (sic), which is construed as a Motion to Disqualify the Arizona Attorney General's Office from representing Defendant Rabie is DENIED (Doc. 20). Defendant Rabie's 18 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed in its entirety as it is barred by the statute of limitations. Defendant Rabie's Request for Attorney's Fees is DENIED. Each Party shall bear their own costs and fees. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 8/20/2013. (See attached PDF for complete information)(ALS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rattler v. Arizona Department of Corrections
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leo Rattler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Department of Corrections
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?