Chamblee v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Jackie Sue Chamblee
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2012cv00222
Filed: March 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Presiding Judge: D Thomas Ferraro
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is Ordered that Magistrate Judge Ferraro's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 9/11/2013. (MFR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chamblee v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jackie Sue Chamblee
Represented By: Meghan McNamara Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Pamela M Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?