Hutchings v. Apker

Petitioner: Kevin Gray Hutchings
Respondent: Craig Apker
Case Number: 4:2012cv00268
Filed: April 12, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Hector C Estrada (PS)
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 2, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss Because of Death of Petitioner; adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 . The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28:2241 is DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter.. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 1/2/2013.(JKM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hutchings v. Apker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin Gray Hutchings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Apker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?