Cuprite Mine Partners LLC v. Anderson

Plaintiff: Cuprite Mine Partners LLC
Defendant: John H Anderson
Case Number: 4:2012cv00286
Filed: April 17, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Glenda E Edmonds
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 2, 2013 122 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the 112 , 115 Motions for Hearings are DENIED, and the 119 Motion to Strike Supplement is DENIED. The 110 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; the 113 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court. The Plaintiffs 66 Motion for Summary Judgm ent for partition by sale is GRANTED for the appointment of a commissioner to sell the property and deposit the proceeds into the Court for distribution to be made by the Court to the parties. Within 10 days of the filing date of this Order, the Plai ntiffs shall file a Notice giving the name of the commissioner to be appointed by the Court to conduct the sale of the property. The Third-party Defendants 103 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the 106 Motion for an Advisory Jury is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 8/1/13.(BAC)
December 20, 2012 97 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the defendants 54 , and 83 motions to expunge the plaintiffs first amended notice of pendency of action are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 12/20/12.(BAC)
December 3, 2012 88 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Magistrate Judge's 65 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motions to Dismiss Docs. 25 , 27 , 44 , 47 and 60 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter remains referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman for all pretrial proceedings and Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 11/30/12.(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cuprite Mine Partners LLC v. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John H Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cuprite Mine Partners LLC
Represented By: Marian Conrad LaLonde
Represented By: John C Lacy
Represented By: Gary Frank Urman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?