Lerma v. Nogales, City of et al

Plaintiff: Diego A Lerma
Defendant: Nogales, City of, Nogales Police Department, Robert Fierros, Unknown Fierros, Jose R Pimienta, Unknown Pimienta, G Ortega, Unknown Ortega, R De La Ossa, Unknown De La Ossa and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2012cv00518
Filed: July 10, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Santa Cruz
Referring Judge: Charles R Pyle
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2014 122 Opinion or Order of the Court *ORDER ADOPTING 115 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court, with the exception leave shall not be granted to amend the complaint. Defendants 96 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DEN IED in part accordingly. The summary judgment is granted as to Plaintiffs claims: that the City of Nogales had a custom or practice of tasering people indiscriminately in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (portion of Claim 1); under the ADA (Claim 2 ); of negligence (Claim 5) alleged against the EMTs only; of inadequate training (Claim 6); of vicarious liability (Claim 9) as to the federal claims only (the parties do not dispute that Claim 9 remains as to the state law claims); and for exemplary damages (Claim 10) except as to Defendant Pimienta. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that summary judgment is denied as to Plaintiffs claims alleging: excessive force in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (portion of Claim 1); assault (Claim 3); battery (Claim 4); negligence (Claim 5) as to the police officers; negligent supervision (Claim 7); intentional infliction of emotional distress (Claim 8); and entitlement to exemplary damages as to Defendant Pimienta (Claim 10). A separate order shall issue setti ng this case for Pretrial Conference on the remaining issues and a date for the filing of the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order and motions in limine. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/30/14. (BAC) *Modified file date from 10/1/14 to 9/30/14; NEF regenerated on 10/1/2014 (SSU).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lerma v. Nogales, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nogales, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nogales Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Fierros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Fierros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose R Pimienta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Pimienta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G Ortega
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Ortega
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R De La Ossa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown De La Ossa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diego A Lerma
Represented By: J Tyrrell Taber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?