Jes Solar Company Limited v. Matinee Energy Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Jes Solar Company Limited
Defendant: Matinee Energy Incorporated, Samsun LLC, S Chin Kim, Unknown Kim, John S Lee, Unknown Lee, Chun Rae Kim, Unknown Spouse Kim, Paul Jeoung, Unknown Jeoung, Tong Soo Chung, Unknown Chung and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2012cv00626
Filed: August 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 524 ORDER granting 521 Motion Proposed Briefing Schedule re Supplemental Filings in Support of Defendants' Applications for Attorneys' Fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that supplemental briefs shall be filed solely1 for the purpose of allowing the Defendants to add a request for appellate fees and costs. The LRCiv. 7.2 shall apply for filing Responses and Replies. The Plaintiffs' Responses shall be limited to 10 pages or less and Replies, if any, shall be limited to 7 pages. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 12/21/2020. (See attached Order for complete details) (DLC)
August 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 501 ORDER denying 496 Motion for Reconsideration (to Alter or Amend a Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.59(e)). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 8/7/2019. (See attached Order for complete details) (DLC)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 490 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Chung's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 469 ) is GRANTED. Kim's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 471 ) is GRANTED. The Motion to Strike (Doc. 487 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 7/1/2019. (See attached Order for complete details)(DLC)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 486 ORDER denying 484 Motion for Leave to Responses and Objections to Plaintiff's Supplemental Statement of Facts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Chung may make such objections by filing a Motion to Strike. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/22/2019. (DLC)
July 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 429 ORDER: Discovery shall be completed by: February 1, 2019. Dispositive motions shall be filed by: March 1, 2019. The parties shall file their joint proposed pretrial order by: April 1, 2019. In the event that dispositive motions are filed, the joint proposed pretrial order will be due 30 days after the Court has decided the motions. (see Order for complete details) Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 6/29/2018. (SIB)
June 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 195 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs 137 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED; Defendants 144 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The 141 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED, and the Plaintiffs shall file th e Second Amended Complaint within 10 days of the filing date of this Order. Plaintiffs 168 Motion for Spoliation is DENIED; Defendants 162 Motion to Withdraw admissions deemed admitted is GRANTED, and Defendants answers are those substituted on 12/27/13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, the parties shall file the Proposed Pretrial Order. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 6/24/14.(BAC)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 AMENDED ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the 48 Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED. The 65 Supplemental Motion to Vacate Default is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court shall set aside the default entered against Defendant Chun Rae Kim. The 61 Motion for Joinder by Chun Rae Kim in the Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED AS MOOT. The 55 Motion to Strike Paragraphs 9 and 10 is DENIED. The 58 Motion to Strike Reply is DENIED AS MOOT because Plaintiffs have filed a Sur-reply. The 45 Motion to Supplemen t the Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT; the Defendants having now appeared, the matter of damages shall be set for trial. The 41 Motion for Default Judgment remains pending for disposition by trial. The parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Order within 30 days of the filing date of this Order. Subsequently, a Pretrial Conference will be held by the Court. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 7/25/13.(BAC)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the 48 Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED. The 65 Supplemental Motion to Vacate Default is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court shall set aside the default entered against Defendant Chun Rae Kim. The 61 Motion for Jo inder by Chun Rae Kim in the Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED AS MOOT. The 55 Motion to Strike Paragraphs 9 and 10 is DENIED. The 58 Motion to Strike Reply is DENIED AS MOOT because Plaintiffs have filed a Sur-reply. The 45 Motion to Suppl ement the Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT; the Defendants having now appeared, the matter of damages shall be set for trial. The 41 Motion for Default Judgment remains pending for disposition by trial. The parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Order within 30 days of the filing date of this Order. Subsequently, a Pretrial Conference will be held by the Court. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 7/25/13.(BAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jes Solar Company Limited v. Matinee Energy Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jes Solar Company Limited
Represented By: Daniel S Ho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matinee Energy Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsun LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S Chin Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John S Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chun Rae Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Spouse Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Jeoung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Jeoung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tong Soo Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?