Harvell v. Winn

Petitioner: Ronnie Harvell
Respondent: Louis Winn
Case Number: 4:2012cv00751
Filed: October 12, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Charles R Pyle (PS)
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 24, 2015 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Pyle's 18 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. Further ordered that this matter is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 4/24/2015.(BAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harvell v. Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ronnie Harvell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Louis Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?