Damiano v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Manuel Damiano
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2012cv00759
Filed: October 15, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: D Thomas Ferraro
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 22, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ; Plaintiff has not established that the ALJs decision was based on legal error or was not supported by substantial evidence. Therefore, the Commissioners decision is affirmed. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs case is DISMISSED and the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge D Thomas Ferraro on 10/22/13. (SMBE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Damiano v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Michael A Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manuel Damiano
Represented By: Deborah Patricia Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?