Pettigrew v. McClintock

Petitioner: David Pettigrew
Respondent: Susan G McClintock
Case Number: 4:2013cv00029
Filed: January 14, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Graham
Referring Judge: Leslie A Bowman (PS)
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 16, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed on January 14, 2013, is DENIED. Doc. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, filed on January 25, 2013, is DENIED. Doc. 6 The Clerk is directed to prepare a judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 5/16/13.(KAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pettigrew v. McClintock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Susan G McClintock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Pettigrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?