Cruz v. Ryan et al

Petitioner: John Montenegro Cruz
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Ron Credio
Case Number: 4:2013cv00389
Filed: May 29, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2018 60 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying Claim 1 and Claims 3-27. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Petitioner's motion for evidentiary hearing and development (Doc. 38 ). An evidentiary hearing to determine whether sentencing counsel were ineffective, as asserted in Claim 2, shall take place as soon as is practicable. The Court will issue a separate order setting this matter for a scheduling conference. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 3/27/2018. (See Order for complete details) (DPS)
September 28, 2016 54 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 53 Ex Parte Sealed Motion for Leave to Provide Legal Representation in State Court Postconviction Proceedings. It is Order federally-appointed counsel is authorized to represent Petitioner in state court for the purpose of seeking state post-conviction relief under Rule 32 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 9/27/2016.(MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?