Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Ollie Lee Lee
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 4:2013cv00768
Filed: August 1, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Leslie A Bowman
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 17, 2015 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and benefits are denied. This case is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 2/13/15.(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ollie Lee Lee
Represented By: Karl E Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?