Kane v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Marc W Kane
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 4:2013cv02357
Filed: December 19, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Cochise
Referring Judge: Leslie A Bowman
Presiding Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 12, 2015 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 20 . It is further ordered that the Commissioner's final decision in this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order and the Report and Recommendation adopted herein. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 3/11/15. (KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kane v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marc W Kane
Represented By: Meghan McNamara Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?