Tucson Embedded Systems Incorporated v. Turbine Powered Technology LLC
Plaintiff:
Tucson Embedded Systems Incorporated
Defendant:
Turbine Powered Technology LLC
Counter_claimant:
Turbine Powered Technology LLC
Counter_defendant:
Tucson Embedded Systems Incorporated
Case Number:
4:2014cv01868
Filed:
February 26, 2014
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Tucson Division Office
County:
Pima
Presiding Judge:
Bruce G Macdonald
Nature of Suit:
Copyrights
Cause of Action:
17:501
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| April 11, 2016 | 138 |
AMENDED ORDER (Amended at 3:11 pursuant to stipulation) granting 89 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Tucson Embedded Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re Arizona Trade Secrets Claim [Counterclaim Count Four]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 4/8/2016. (KEP)
|
| March 31, 2016 | 129 |
ORDER granting 89 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Tucson Embedded Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re Arizona Trade Secrets Claim [Counterclaim Count Four]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 3/31/2016. (See Order for details) (DPS)
|
| September 23, 2014 | 50 |
ORDER DENYING 25 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants Motion for Declaratory Judgment or, Alternatively, for Preliminary Injunctive Relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 9/19/14.(BAC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
