Moreno v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company et al
| Glenda Moreno |
| Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Securian Financial Network Incorporated, Securian Financial Services Incorporated, Affinion Benefits Group LLC, Affinion Group LLC, Affinion Group Incorporated, Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank NA, Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA Incorporated, Wells Fargo Insurance Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2014cv02022 |
| April 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Charles R Pyle |
| Frank R Zapata |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 25 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. It is Ordered that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complai nt (Doc. 22 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is Ordered that Plaintiff's Third, Fourth and Fifth Claims of the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with leave to amend. It is Ordered that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 22 ) is DENIED as to Plaintiffs First and Second Claims (see attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 3/30/2015.(MFR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
