Tiznado-Reyna v. Holder

Petitioner: Esteban Tiznado-Reyna
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Case Number: 4:2014cv02428
Filed: October 21, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 08:1252
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 10, 2016 64 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment filed on September 17, 2015 (Doc. 50 ) is DENIED. It is further Order that pursuant to the Court's July 1, 2015 Scheduling Order, the parties shall file a joint proposed pretrial order within 30 days of the date this Order is filed (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 6/8/2016.(MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tiznado-Reyna v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Esteban Tiznado-Reyna
Represented By: Pamela L Hartman(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Represented By: Robert Michael Stalzer(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?