Gasaway v. Winn

Petitioner: Edmon Gasaway
Respondent: Louis Winn
Case Number: 4:2015cv00248
Filed: June 8, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Charles R Pyle (PS)
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 3, 2017 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Edmond Gasaway's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is denied. This Court shall adopt the Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle's Report and Recommendation as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court and the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 12/15/2016. (SIB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gasaway v. Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edmon Gasaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Louis Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?