Mixon v. United States Bureau of Prisons

Plaintiff: Wynona Mixon
Defendant: United States Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 4:2016cv00260
Filed: May 6, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Referring Judge: Bruce G Macdonald
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 21, 2017 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED that the 12 Motion to Dismiss is granted. Ordered that the 21 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 2/21/2017.(BAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mixon v. United States Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wynona Mixon
Represented By: A Bates Butler, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?