Maxwell v. Clay

Petitioner: Ray Maxwell
Respondent: Becky Clay
Case Number: 4:2016cv00393
Filed: June 23, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: D Thomas Ferraro (PS)
Presiding Judge: James A Soto
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 6, 2018 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Magistrate Judge Ferraro's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18 ) is accepted and adopted. It is further Ordered the Petition (Doc. 1 ) is denied due to lack of jurisdiction. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this matter and close this case. The certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 6/5/2018. (MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxwell v. Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ray Maxwell
Represented By: Jeremy Brian Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Becky Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?