Garcia v. Lake
Petitioner: Steven P Garcia
Respondent: Steven Lake
Case Number: 4:2016cv00407
Filed: June 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Graham
Presiding Judge: D Thomas Ferraro (PS)
Presiding Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER that the Petition (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. the Clerk of the Court to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner Stephen P. Garcia, Fed. Reg. No. 09353-097, RRM Sacramento, Residential Reentry Office, 501 I Street, Suite 9-400, Sacramento, CA 95814. Signed by Magistrate Judge D Thomas Ferraro on 4/26/2018. (SIB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia v. Lake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven P Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven Lake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?