McBeath v. Tucson Tamale Company
||Melissa Martin McBeath
||Tucson Tamale Company
||July 11, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Tucson Division Office
||Bernardo P Velasco
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||29 U.S.C. § 621
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 21, 2017
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order that Protects Defendants' Employees from Intimidation and Declares that Plaintiff may have Ex Parte Contact with Them (Doc. 30 ) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. It is further Ord ered that Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order to Shield Experts Consulted Informally (Doc 39 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is further Ordered Defendants' Motion to Quash and for Protective Order Protecting Third Party Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency from Plaintiff's Subpoena (Doc. 55 ) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. It is further Ordered Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants: (1) to give their consent to Google to produce responsive e-mails; ( 2) to allow Shawn Kaylor to produce responsive e-mails; (3) to destroy employment files obtained from Plaintiff's prior employer; and (4) to narrow subpoena served on Glenn Murphy (Doc. 70 ) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P Velasco on 7/20/2017.(MFR)
|February 23, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is Ordered that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29 ) is adopted as the opinion of the Court. It is further Ordered that the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 18 ) is DENIED. It is further Ordered that the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 25 ) is GRANTED. It is further Ordered that this case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 2/21/2017. (MFR)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?