Bailey v. United States of America et al
| Donald D Bailey |
| United States of America, Theodore Spencer, Van Nguyen, Amy Matchison, Segrid Settles, Lorie Hale and Philip Ward |
| 4:2017cv00032 |
| January 19, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Eric J Markovich |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10 ); denying Defendant Hale's Motion to Dismiss as moot (Doc. 22 ); granting Defendants' Motion to Substitute Party (Doc. 12 ); and denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc . 19 ). It is further Ordered dismissing all individually named defendants with prejudice. It is further Ordered substituting the United States of America as the sole defendant. It is further Ordered dismissing Plaintiff's tax refund claims without prejudice. It is further Ordered dismissing Plaintiff's common law tort claims with prejudice. This action is dismissed, and the Clerk shall close its file on this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich on 11/16/2017.(MFR)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER that the 7/27/2017 Minute Order (Doc. 26 ) is VACATED. It is further Ordered that the assignment of this matter to the Magistrate Judge Eric. J. Markovich is CONFIRMED. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 8/10/2017. (MFR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
