Jackson v. Ryan et al
Jerry Ramon Jackson |
Charles Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Stols |
4:2017cv00058 |
February 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pinal |
Leslie A Bowman |
Frank R Zapata |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (Doc. 41 ) Report and Recommendation. THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and this case is dismissed with prejudice; IT IS FURT HER ORDERED that Petitioner's Application for a Certificate of Appealability from the District Court (Doc. 45 ) is DENIED, based on Petitioner having failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. [Review ORDER for details.] Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 12/4/2019. (MCO) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting 16 petitioner's motion for a stay of the petition for writ of habeas corpus; granting in part 19 petitioner's motion for an extension of the deadline for filing a reply to the respondents' answer to his petition for writ of habeas corpus and an extension of the deadline for filing a reply in support of his motion for stay and abeyance; denying as moot 21 petitioner's motion to amend his petition to remove unexhausted claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 8/4/2017. (See Order for details) (DPS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.