Parish v. Lansdale et al
Plaintiff: Miles Parish
Defendant: Troy Lansdale, Bradley Kush, Roberto Villasenor, Tucson, City of and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2017cv00186
Filed: April 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 269 ORDERED that the Plaintiff's and Defendant Lansdale's 268 Joint Motion for Extension of Time until July 2, 2021 to File Plaintiff's Fee Application is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 6/25/2021. (ARC)
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 165 JOINT Motion in Limine. This Order only addresses objections related to the failure to disclose and does not address other appropriate objections under the Federal Rules of Evidence. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 5/17/2021. (See attached Order for complete details) (DLC)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ORDERED: Defendants' "Joint Motion in Limine #1: for Separate Trials before the Same Jury on Individual Officer Liability (Phase One), and Monell Liability (Phase Two)" (Doc. 111 ) is GRANTED. Defendants Lansdale and Kush's &quo t;Motion in Limine No. 1 Regarding Preclusion of Internal Affairs Investigation Materials" (Doc. 99 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as to Phase One of the trial as stated within the body of this Order. Defendants Lansdale and Kush' s Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude TPD General Orders (Doc. 100 ) is GRANTED as to Phase One of the trial, to the extent stated in this Order. Defendants Lansdale and Kush's Motion in Limine No. 5 to Preclude Letter from TPD to Plaintiff Advi sing that Plaintiff's Complaint was Sustained (Doc. 103 ) is GRANTED with regard to Phase One of the trial. Defendants Lansdale and Kush's Motion in Limine No. 6 to Preclude the TPD Letter of Reprimand Given to Defendant Lansdale (Doc. 104 ) is GRANTED with regard to Phase One of the trial. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 5/6/2021. (ARC)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion in Limine # 1: Preclude Speculative and Irrelevant Opinion Re: Drug/Alcohol Use" (Doc. 121 ) is GRANTED. Defendants may not question witnesses, refer to, or present argument relating to (1) Dr. Day's notes that Plaintiff was intoxicated and smelled of alcohol and marijuana, or (2) Plaintiff's statement that Dr. Day made the notes because he might have been biased against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 4/21/21. (MYE)
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 63 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants Troy Lansdale's and Bradley Kush's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 64 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Pla intiff's negligence claims and claim for punitive damages as to his state causes of action are dismissed. Defendants City of Tucson and Chief of Police's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 66 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The TPD Police Chief is DISMISSED with prejudice. The parties shall file the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order on or before October 30, 2019. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 9/30/2019. (See attached Order for complete details)(DLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parish v. Lansdale et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miles Parish
Represented By: Stacy Estes Scheff
Represented By: Stephen Michael Weeks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Troy Lansdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley Kush
Represented By: Viola Romero-Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roberto Villasenor
Represented By: Viola Romero-Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucson, City of
Represented By: Viola Romero-Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?