Montgomery v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Thomas Montgomery
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 4:2017cv00201
Filed: May 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Rosemary Marquez
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting 77 Motion to Bifurcate. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/23/2019. (BAR)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER denying 58 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 11/21/2018. (BAR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montgomery v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Montgomery
Represented By: David Einer Schlesinger
Represented By: Nicholas D Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?