Powell v. Tucson Medical Center

Plaintiff: Gordon Powell
Defendant: Tucson Medical Center
Case Number: 4:2017cv00543
Filed: November 7, 2017
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline M Rateau
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 25, 2018 33 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that TMC's Renewed Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19 ) is granted. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the FAC. If Plaintiff elects to amend, the Second Amended Complaint shall be filed by 5/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 4/24/2018. (MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Powell v. Tucson Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gordon Powell
Represented By: Ivelisse Bonilla-Torrado
Represented By: Shannon Lori Giles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucson Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?