D.G. et al v. Tucson Unified School District
Plaintiff: Y.G. and D.G.
Defendant: Tucson Unified School District
Case Number: 4:2018cv00583
Filed: December 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Eric J Markovich
Referring Judge: Rosemary Marquez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2019 Filing 15 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff D.G.. (Rockafellow, Leighton)
January 22, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Tucson Unified School District. (Welker, Christopher)
January 18, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff D.G.. (Rockafellow, Leighton)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: A telephonic Scheduling Conference will be held in the above entitled action on 2/7/19 at 2:30 p.m., before Judge Markovich's law clerk. The parties shall file with the Court, on or before 1/31/19, a joint report. (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich on 1/9/19.(BAC)
December 21, 2018 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Tucson Unified School District.(Welker, Christopher)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich for all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation. All future filings in this case shall be designated: CV-18-00583-TUC-RM(EJM). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 12/13/18.(BAC)
December 11, 2018 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this Case is reassigned by random draw to District Judge, Rosemary Marquez. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-18-00583-TUC-RM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.(BAC)
December 11, 2018 Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC)
December 11, 2018 Filing 6 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by D.G.. (Rockafellow, Leighton)
December 6, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Tucson Unified School District. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC)
December 6, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC)
December 6, 2018 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16273815. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eric J Markovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-00583-TUC-EJM. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions.(BAC)
December 6, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20185416. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-16273815 filed by Tucson Unified School District. (Welker, Christopher) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: D.G. et al v. Tucson Unified School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Y.G.
Represented By: Leighton Howard Rockafellow, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: D.G.
Represented By: Leighton Howard Rockafellow, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucson Unified School District
Represented By: Christopher Scott Welker
Represented By: Matthew William Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?