Ratchford et al v. Hi-Fi Tucson LLC
Plaintiff: Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Abigail Ratchford, Eva Pepaj and Tiffany Toth Gray
Defendant: Hi-Fi Tucson LLC and Hi-Fi Tucson LLC an Arizona Corporation doing business as Hi Fi Kitchen & Cocktails
Case Number: 4:2019cv00137
Filed: March 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Rosemary Marquez
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Filing 22 MOTION to Substitute Attorney also Plaintiffs Eva Pepaj & Abigail Ratchford by Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Wilkins, Amy)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDERED that Mr. Traulsen's "Amended Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record" (Doc. #20 ) is granted. Mr. Traulsen and the firm of Begam Marks & Traulsen, P.A., are hereby withdrawn as counsel of record in this case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 6/18/2019. (ARC)
June 6, 2019 Filing 20 Second MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Traulsen, Richard)
May 22, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford. (Bush, Brian)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: This case is subject to the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (MIDP). Discovery due by 11/15/2019. Dispositive motions due by 12/13/2019. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/10/2020. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 5/20/2019. (See attached Order for complete details)(DLC)
May 10, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Hi-Fi Tucson LLC. (Stone, Erik)
May 10, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiffs Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford. (Bush, Brian)
May 3, 2019 Filing 15 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Plaintiffs Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford. (Bush, Brian)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying without prejudice #13 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The Motion does not comply with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 83.3(b). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/24/2019. (DLC)
April 22, 2019 Filing 13 First MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Traulsen, Richard)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying as moot #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonic. Per #9 Order dated 4/11/2019, Plaintiff shall initiate the telephonic conference with all other parties on the line. Ordered by Judge Rosemary Marquez. (RM, lm) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
April 19, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Telephonic by Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bush, Brian)
April 11, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE re: Notice Of Withdrawal Of Counsel For Plaintiffs by Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford . (Traulsen, Richard)
April 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDERED that a Telephonic Pretrial Scheduling Conference is set for May 9, 2019 at 10:00 AM before Joseph Falcon-Freeman, law clerk to the Honorable Rosemary Mrquez, at (520) 205-4621. The parties are directed to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the objectives of the conference. Counsel shall file with the Court, on or before May 3, 2019, a Joint Report reflecting the results of their meeting and outlining their discovery plan. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/11/2019. (See attached Order for complete details)(ARC)
April 11, 2019 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Brian Bush on behalf of plaintiffs. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
April 10, 2019 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hi-Fi Tucson LLC. (Stone, Erik)
April 10, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Hi-Fi Tucson LLC.(Stone, Erik) *Modified text to reflect document on 4/11/2019 (KAH).
March 21, 2019 Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford: Proof of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Notice To Parties - Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project with General Order 17-08 and Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project Checklist upon John T. Gilbert, Statutory Agent, HI-FI Tucson, LLC on 03/20/2019. (Traulsen, Richard)
March 19, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Hi-Fi Tucson LLC. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
March 19, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ARC)
March 18, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16664372. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-137-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC)
March 18, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Paola Canas, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray, Eva Pepaj, Abigail Ratchford. (Bush, Brian) (ARC)
March 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16664372 filed by Abigail Ratchford, Paola Canas, Eva Pepaj, Ana Cheri, Tiffany Toth Gray.(Bush, Brian) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ratchford et al v. Hi-Fi Tucson LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paola Canas
Represented By: Richard Phillip Traulsen
Represented By: Brian M Bush
Represented By: Raymond P Boucher
Represented By: Amy Marie Wilkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ana Cheri
Represented By: Richard Phillip Traulsen
Represented By: Brian M Bush
Represented By: Raymond P Boucher
Represented By: Amy Marie Wilkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abigail Ratchford
Represented By: Richard Phillip Traulsen
Represented By: Brian M Bush
Represented By: Raymond P Boucher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eva Pepaj
Represented By: Richard Phillip Traulsen
Represented By: Brian M Bush
Represented By: Raymond P Boucher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Toth Gray
Represented By: Richard Phillip Traulsen
Represented By: Brian M Bush
Represented By: Raymond P Boucher
Represented By: Amy Marie Wilkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hi-Fi Tucson LLC
Represented By: Erik John Stone
Represented By: Jonathan Taylor Brinkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hi-Fi Tucson LLC an Arizona Corporation doing business as Hi Fi Kitchen & Cocktails
Represented By: Erik John Stone
Represented By: Jonathan Taylor Brinkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?