Orantez v. Shinn et al
| Jesse Gilbert Orantez |
| David Shinn and Mark Brnovich |
| 4:2019cv00540 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Leslie A Bowman (PS) |
| David C Bury |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Jesse Gilbert Orantez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Amended Petition, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Storts, Brick) |
Filing 3
ORDERED that Petitioner's #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended petition. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit an amended petition within 30 days. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 11/22/2019. (BAR)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 0970-17636982 filed by Jesse Gilbert Orantez. (Storts, Brick) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
