McCune v. Nova Home Loans
| McCune |
| Mark McCune and Nova Home Loans |
| 4:2019cv00600 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION Emergency Motion for Hearing before March 4th to Correct the Illegal April 1st 2016 Deed of Trust by Mark McCune. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ARC) |
| Filing 14 MOTION Emergency Motion to Set Hearing before March 4th 2020 to Correct the Illegal April 1st 2016 Deed of Trust by Mark McCune. (ARC) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (43 in 4:19-cv-00525-CKJ) MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by PHH Mortgage. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C) (Associated Cases: 4:19-cv-00525-CKJ, 4:19-cv-00600-RM) (Krotzer, Solomon) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re: (43 in 4:19-cv-00525-CKJ, 43 in 4:19-cv-00525-CKJ) MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Mark McCune. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Associated Cases: 4:19-cv-00525-CKJ, 4:19-cv-00600-RM) (ARC) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by PHH Mortgage. (Associated Cases: CV-19-00525-TUC-CKJ,CV-19-00600-TUC-RM) (Krotzer, Solomon) |
Filing 10
ORDERED that Plaintiff's #8 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order to Stop Jan. 8 Foreclosure is denied. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 1/3/2020. (BAR)
|
| Filing 9 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Defendant Mark McCune. (BAR) |
| Filing 8 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order to Stop Jan 8th Foreclosure by Mark McCune. (BAR) |
|
Filing 7
ORDERED that Plaintiff's #2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is denied. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 12/30/2019. (BAR)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAC) |
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-00600-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mark McCune. (BAC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Mark McCune. (BAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (TRO Requested) filed by Mark McCune.(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
