Contreras v. Nogales, City of et al
Plaintiff: Luis E Contreras
Defendant: Nogales, City of, Martin Quezada, HCH Tucson Holdings LLC, Andres Palafox and HCH Tucson Holdings LLC doing business as Carondelet Holy Cross Hospital
Case Number: 4:2020cv00199
Filed: May 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Referring Judge: David C Bury
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2020 Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HCH Tucson Holdings LLC. (San Angelo, Melissa)
June 29, 2020 Filing 12 *Defendant HCH Tucson Holdings, LLC d/b/a Carondelet Holy Cross Hospital's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by HCH Tucson Holdings LLC.(San Angelo, Melissa) *Document is not in compliance with L.R.Civ 7.1(c); attorney notified on on 6/30/2020 (MCO).
June 24, 2020 Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Response by Andres Palafox, Martin Quezada. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jellison, James)
June 24, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James M Jellison on behalf of Andres Palafox, Martin Quezada. (Jellison, James)
June 13, 2020 Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Luis E Contreras: Return of Service re: complaint, summons, orders upon HCH Tucson Holdings, LLC on June 3, 2020. (Tate, Elizabeth)
June 13, 2020 Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Luis E Contreras: Return of Service re: complaint, summons, orders upon Martin Quezada on June 2, 2020. (Tate, Elizabeth)
June 13, 2020 Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Luis E Contreras: Return of Service re: complaint, summons, orders upon Andres Palafox on June 2, 2020. (Tate, Elizabeth)
June 13, 2020 Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Luis E Contreras: Return of Service re: complaint, summons, orders upon City of Nogales on June 3, 2020. (Tate, Elizabeth)
June 2, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to HCH Tucson Holdings LLC, Nogales, City of, Andres Palafox, Martin Quezada. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED: Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If properly completed, the Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses filed at Docs. 2, 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 6/2/2020. (MCO)
May 8, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE)
May 8, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Luis E Contreras. (Tate, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(MYE)
May 8, 2020 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18264930 filed by Luis E Contreras. (Tate, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contreras v. Nogales, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luis E Contreras
Represented By: Elizabeth Diane Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nogales, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin Quezada
Represented By: James M Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HCH Tucson Holdings LLC
Represented By: Melissa Sue San Angelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andres Palafox
Represented By: James M Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HCH Tucson Holdings LLC doing business as Carondelet Holy Cross Hospital
Represented By: Melissa Sue San Angelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?