Gillespie v. Lawall et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Edward Gillespie
Defendant: Mark Evans and Barbara Lawall
Case Number: 4:2020cv00384
Filed: September 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Referring Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2020 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed September 15, 2020, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed for failure to state a claim. This dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (MYE)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Thomas Edward Gillespie. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 9/15/20. (MYE)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure to state a claim may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Order and because there is no arguable factual or legal basis for an appeal. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 9/15/20. (MYE)
September 8, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE)
September 8, 2020 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Thomas Edward Gillespie. (1 page) (MYE)
September 8, 2020 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Thomas Edward Gillespie. (2 pages) (MYE)
September 8, 2020 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Thomas Edward Gillespie. (6 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gillespie v. Lawall et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Edward Gillespie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Lawall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?