Alferez v. Marshall et al
| Marco Antonio Alferez |
| Unknown Marshall, Unknown Haight-Bieler, Unknown Alexander, Ann Ash, Unknown Newland, Unknown Estrada, Unknown Archuletta and J Cox |
| 4:2021cv00390 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Raner C Collins |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER the Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 10/21/21. (JAM)
|
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number TUC033552. PAID IN FULL. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (JAM) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Marco Antonio Alferez. (11 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
