Brewster v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Mark Gordon Brewster |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 4:2022cv00105 |
| March 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| D Thomas Ferraro |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, United States Attorney, and United States Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 6
ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (Doc. #2 ) is granted without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefore. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service of the summons and complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge D Thomas Ferraro on 3/4/22. (MYE)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the parties must fully comply with the following deadlines and procedures. Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief addressing why the Commissioner's decision is not supported by substantial evidence or why the decision should otherwise be reversed or the case remanded. Defendant must file an answering brief within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendant's brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge D Thomas Ferraro on 3/4/22. (See attached Order for complete details.)(MYE)
|
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable D Thomas Ferraro. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-105-TUC-DTF. Magistrate Election form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mark Gordon Brewster. (Menard, Autumn) (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs)(MYE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Mark Gordon Brewster. (Menard, Autumn) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mark Gordon Brewster. (Menard, Autumn) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brewster v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Gordon Brewster | |
| Represented By: | Autumn Jane Menard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
