Catchings v. Dulgov
| Deshon Catchings |
| A Dulgov |
| 4:2022cv00388 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| D Thomas Ferraro (PS) |
| D Thomas Ferraro |
| James A Soto |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Summons, the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order upon the US Attorney for the District of Arizona by certified mail addressed to the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney pursuant to Rule 4(i)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court must also send by certified mail a copy of the Summons, the Petition, and this Order to the US Attorney General pursuant to Rule 4(i)(1)(B) and to Respondent pursuant to Rule 4(i)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Respondent A. Dulgov must answer the Petition within 20 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 10/28/2022. (MCO)
|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 400000338. PAID IN FULL. (MCO) |
|
Filing 4
ORDERED: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/9/2022. (ARC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) by Petitioner Deshon Catchings. (27 pages) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Deshon Catchings. (83 pages) (Attachments: #1 Verified Exhibit List in Support of Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28:2241 and Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Decision Under 5:706(2)(A), #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Catchings v. Dulgov | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Deshon Catchings | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: A Dulgov | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
