Caraffa #350727 v. State of Arizona et al
Plaintiff: Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant: State of Arizona, United States of America, ADCRR, United States District Court for the District of Arizona, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Unknown Parties, Joe Biden and Arizona, State of
Case Number: 4:2024cv00078
Filed: February 8, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Referring Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2024 Filing 9 USCA Case Number re: #8 Notice of Appeal. Case number 24-1611, Ninth Circuit. (copies distributed by Ninth Circuit) (DLC)
March 5, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #7 Clerks Judgment by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (68 pages) (KAH)
March 4, 2024 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed March 4, 2024, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (MCO)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert these claims in the future, Plaintiff must pay the filing and administrative fees in full when filing the new action. Plaintiff's "Motion... Constitutional Error of the Court" (Doc. #5 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Order and because there is no arguable factual or legal basis for an appeal. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 3/4/24. (MCO)
February 27, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION for Constitutional Error of the Court as a Policy or Custom to Violation(s) of Constitutional Procedure and Violations of the US Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment Due Process of Law by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (6 pages) (MCO)
February 9, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE re: FRCiv 5.2 Privacy Protection Guidelines. (SCA)
February 9, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to General Order 23-19, which supersedes General Order 14-17. Please see attached Order and Instructions. (Attachments: # 1 E-Filing Instructions). (SCA)
February 8, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA)
February 8, 2024 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Alfred Erika Caraffa. (9 pages)(SCA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caraffa #350727 v. State of Arizona et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alfred Erika Caraffa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADCRR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Biden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?