Dowling v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Angela Dawn Dowling |
United States Marshals Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Marshals and Unknown Party |
4:2024cv00390 |
August 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
Cindy K Jorgenson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer in District of New Jersey. New Case Number: 3:24-cv-8428. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 4 ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). The Clerk of Court must close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 8/9/2024. (ARC) |
Remark: Case transferred out to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (Attachments: #1 Instructions) (SCA) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Angela Dawn Dowling. (5 pages) (SCA) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Angela Dawn Dowling. (6 pages)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.