Ehrenfried v. Brothers et al
Daniel H Ehrenfried |
Michael Hyde, Unknown Parties, Judi Hyde, Unknown Lindley, Terri Lindley and Dana J Brothers |
4:2024cv00421 |
August 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Scott H Rash |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE re: Deposit by Daniel H Ehrenfried re: #12 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, . (Itkin, Steven) |
Filing 13 Notice Pursuant to A.R.S. 12-2406(C) and Notice Pursuant to A.R.S. 12-2402(E) issued. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (ARC) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion For Provisional Remedy Under A.R.S. 12-2402 Without Notice. Plaintiff shall file a Bond for Attachment in the sum of THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($375,000.00), and an affidavit under A.R.S. 12-1522. It is further ordered the U.S. Marshall, or any law enforcement officer in the State of Arizona where the above-described Property is located, shall attach an amount sufficient to satisfy the demand of Plaintiff, together with probable costs of this action. It is further ordered the Clerk of Court shall issue the notices filed by Plaintiff (Docs. #11 -2, #11 -3). Signed by Judge Scott H Rash on 9/24/2024. (See Order for complete details)(ARC) |
Filing 11 MOTION Application for Provisional Remedy - Attachment by Daniel H Ehrenfried. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Issuance of Order for Provisional Remedy without Notice, #2 Attachment Notice Pursuant to A.R.S. 12-2406(C), #3 Attachment Notice Pursuant to A.R.S. 12-2402(E), #4 Proposed Order Order for Provisional Remedy - Attachment)(Itkin, Steven) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Dana J Brothers, Judi Hyde, Michael Hyde, Terri Lindley, Unknown Lindley. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Submitted by Daniel H Ehrenfried. (Itkin, Steven) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Submitted by Daniel H Ehrenfried. (Itkin, Steven) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by Daniel H Ehrenfried. (Itkin, Steven) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by Daniel H Ehrenfried. (Itkin, Steven) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Daniel H Ehrenfried. (Itkin, Steven) |
Filing 4 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Daniel H Ehrenfried. (Itkin, Steven) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Daniel H Ehrenfried. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: PLEASE file Civil Cover Sheet. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-23384759. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Scott H Rash. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-421-TUC-SHR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-23384759 filed by Daniel H Ehrenfried. (Itkin, Steven) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.