Johnson v. Maples et al
| Frederick Johnson |
| Maples, Dixon, Cargil and Regina Basewell |
| 1:2008cv00020 |
| April 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Chicot |
| James M. Moody |
| H. David Young |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT re 31 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations dismissing complaint without prejudice and denying relief sought. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/23/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
28
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Pltf's complaint 2 5 9 be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to prosecute; the Court certify that an ifp appeal taken the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith; Objections to R&R due by 3/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 3/6/09. (vjt) (Modified on 3/6/2009 to correct typographical error) (vjt).
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER directing service on Defendants by the U.S. Marshal; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint (docket entry #2), amended complaints (docket entries #5 & #9), addendum (docket entry #10), this order, and summons, upon Defendants, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 11/17/08. (mkf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
