Boyd v. Armstrong et al
| Alvester Boyd, III |
| Shelia Armstrong, Todd Ball, Billy Cowell, Wendy Kelly and J Maples |
| 1:2008cv00043 |
| August 22, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Pulaski |
| Jerry W. Cavaneau |
| Brian S. Miller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT re 32 Order on Report and Recommendations dismissing complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/27/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that pltf's complt be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with LR 5.5(c)(2), and for failure to respond to the Court's order 2 6 . The Court certify that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 2/9/2009. (lej)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 14 Partial Report and Recommendations dismissing claims against defts Kelly, May, Baswell, Norris, Maples and Heier without prejudice. Service is appropriate for defts Cowell, Ball and Armstrong and the Clerk is directed to prepare the summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve summons, complaint and amended complaint with any attachments upon the remaining defts. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/9/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
