Defoor v. Dowell et al
| James Defoor |
| Rhonda Dowell, Richard Sheppard and Robert Barnett |
| 1:2009cv00028 |
| May 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Independence |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Henry L. Jones |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting in part defts' motion for summary judgment with respect to all claims except pltf's Eighth Amendment mental health claim 27 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 4/1/10. (tjj)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 44 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 46 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 2/22/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 40 Notice (construed as a Motion to Re-Open by the Court filed by Mike James Defoor and directing the Clerk to re-open the case and the defts to file a reply to pltf's response to the pending summary judgment motion within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 1/26/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER directing the plaintiff to file a response to the 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by defts within ten days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 11/30/09. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
