Forrest et al v. Bowers et al
| Steven Donnelle Cody, Larry Ervin, Tony Branscum and Keith Tyler Forrest |
| Ballard, Keith Bowers, Steve Jeffreys and John Furgueson |
| 1:2011cv00026 |
| April 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Independence |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
JUDGMENT pursuant to 64 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations entered this date, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this action with prejudice; the relief sought is denied. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/23/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING 52 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf Keith Tyler Forrest's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and for failure to respond to the Court's Order; Forrest's name is removed as a party pltf; defts' motion to dismiss 41 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/28/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER adopting 21 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf Steven Donnell Cody's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Cody's name is removed as a party pltf; this dismissal counts as a "strike" with respect to Cody. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/31/11. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
