Bush-Retherford v. S&S Recovery Inc
Plaintiff: Dody Bush-Retherford
Defendant: S&S Recovery Inc
Case Number: 1:2011cv00042
Filed: May 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Batesville Office
County: Izard
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DIMSISSAL dismissing all claims in this cause of action with prejudice, each side to bear their own costs and attorney's fees herein. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/5/11. (hph)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bush-Retherford v. S&S Recovery Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S&S Recovery Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dody Bush-Retherford
Represented By: David M. Marco
Represented By: Larry Paul Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?