Anderson v. Bank of Salem

Plaintiff: Don Anderson
Defendant: Bank of Salem
Case Number: 1:2012cv00028
Filed: March 8, 2012
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Batesville Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 25, 2012 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER dismissing this case pursuant to the 8 Joint Motion to Dismiss; dismissing the Complaint and all claims in this action with prejudice as to all parties; and, directing the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/25/2012. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Bank of Salem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Don Anderson
Represented By: Daniel Odell Turner
Represented By: Michael Todd Harrison
Represented By: Todd Martin Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of Salem
Represented By: Marshall S. Ney
Represented By: Carl Dwayne Plumlee
Represented By: Christopher Dwayne Plumlee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?